HyperNeRF: A Higher-Dimensional Representation for Topologically Varying Neural Radiance Fields

Keunhong Park, Utkarsh Sinha, Peter Hedman, Jonathan T. Barron, Sofien Bouaziz, Dan B Goldman, Ricardo Martin-Brualla, Steven M. Seitz

6/24/2021

Keywords: Dynamic/Temporal, Fundamentals, Global Conditioning, Local Conditioning

Venue: ARXIV 2021

Bibtex: @article{park2021hypernerf, journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.13228}, booktitle = {ArXiv Pre-print}, author = {Keunhong Park and Utkarsh Sinha and Peter Hedman and Jonathan T. Barron and Sofien Bouaziz and Dan B Goldman and Ricardo Martin-Brualla and Steven M. Seitz}, title = {HyperNeRF: A Higher-Dimensional Representation for Topologically Varying Neural Radiance Fields}, year = {2021}, url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.13228v2}, entrytype = {article}, id = {park2021hypernerf} }

Abstract

Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) are able to reconstruct scenes with unprecedented fidelity, and various recent works have extended NeRF to handle dynamic scenes. A common approach to reconstruct such non-rigid scenes is through the use of a learned deformation field mapping from coordinates in each input image into a canonical template coordinate space. However, these deformation-based approaches struggle to model changes in topology, as topological changes require a discontinuity in the deformation field, but these deformation fields are necessarily continuous. We address this limitation by lifting NeRFs into a higher dimensional space, and by representing the 5D radiance field corresponding to each individual input image as a slice through this "hyper-space". Our method is inspired by level set methods, which model the evolution of surfaces as slices through a higher dimensional surface. We evaluate our method on two tasks: (i) interpolating smoothly between "moments", i.e., configurations of the scene, seen in the input images while maintaining visual plausibility, and (ii) novel-view synthesis at fixed moments. We show that our method, which we dub HyperNeRF, outperforms existing methods on both tasks by significant margins. Compared to Nerfies, HyperNeRF reduces average error rates by 8.6% for interpolation and 8.8% for novel-view synthesis, as measured by LPIPS.

Citation Graph
(Double click on nodes to open corresponding papers' pages)

* Showing citation graph for papers within our database. Data retrieved from Semantic Scholar. For full citation graphs, visit ConnectedPapers.